! Choose language
選擇你的語言
close  
 Language 

公告

  • \"... a deeply astute performance as Raymond... intelligent, conflicted, humorous, obsessive, in love and out of love...\" — KIM VOYNAR, cinematical.com

BLOG

  • Hollywood, is White really ALL THAT? (commentary on "21)

    2008-03-29 11:34AM / 標準BLOG / 會員可以看
    11個評論

    Today marks the release of "21," based on the best-seller, "Bringing Down The House," about a group of MIT students who figured out a card-counting scheme, and cracked the blackjack tables in Vegas, taking them for millions. It has been noted that Hollywood changed the ethnicity of the central character – modeled after Chinese American Jeff Ma – to your generic White-guy hero, "Ben Campbell," played by new-comer Jim Sturgess. 

    I have always proclaimed that Hollywood – the flim and TV business – is one of the most racist industries around, blatantly able to discriminate (in hiring/casting) under the guise of "artistic freedom," so this type of old-school racism shouldn’t surprise me.  Nevertheless, I am shocked by how brazen Hollywood still is about this type of racist practice, here in the 21st century, and equally saddened by some of the ignorant excuses behind it, and equally ignorant mindset of those defending it, including Ma himself.  But, Racism is ignorance. So, the educating that needs to happen definitely is far from done.  For the producers of the film, and others who may wish to be informed, let me try to shed some light. 

    In examining the core issues it is important to distinguish what they are, as well as are not.  What needs to be asked of the filmmakers is not "Why did you make the central figure White?" but rather, "Why did you change the central figure to White?"  This story is based on real history, and real people.  It’s one thing if the writers are creating a character in whole, but not the case here, so the filmmakers need to be held accountable for making this specific change.  In addition to asking the filmmakers this question, they need to be asked also, not "Why did you do this?", but "Why do you keep doing this?"  Hollywood has a long history, and each film does not exist in a world unto itself, but in a time, in a genre, subject to trends, history of styles, etc. It is part of an extended tradition.  Filmmakers need to be knowledgeable and informed, socially as well as technically, about the medium they are creating in.  Filmmaking is not just about employing cutting-edge technology, but involves social implications of their choices as well.  If they choose to change the race of a character, they need to understand what that means in a context, which is our society, and not in a vacuum, which might be their imagination.

    In short, Hollywood’s answer to both questions boils down to "White is better."

    Historically, Hollywood has continually demonstrated in a number of ways, the belief that White is better. Back in the day, it’s understandable how this all started.  Asians were a miniscule minority, especially in a strongly European-rooted Hollywood, so maybe the talent pool was shallow.  Laws specifically prevented Asians from immigrating here, and those here from becoming citizens, so it’s not too difficult to look back and see that anti-Asian sentiments were common. But, we should hope that some change has occurred over the last 80-90 years, not just in attitude, but in practice.

    Hardly so.  Racism is still rampant.  Here are a few examples.

    "Yellowface" casting has been around since the earliest days, but is still happening as recently as 2007, with Brian Dennehy playing Kublai Khan in the TV mini-series, "Marco Polo." Cultural Hijacking had all the White Norris/Seagal/VanDamme types stealing the martial arts genre in the 70s and 80s, and today, the Fast and the Furious movies are exploiting the Asian American car culture, but with White leads. Identity theft switched a real-life 11 y.o. South Asian med student to a White Doogie Howser M.D., and a Dutch-Afro-Cuban-Chinese Mariane Pearl to Angelina Jolie in "A Mighty Heart" (2007).  History is re-written to allow Tom Cruise to be a Samurai, and  Anime icons Speed Racer and Astro Boy, originating from Japan, are turned White, as are entire films, with the recent trend of remaking Asian blockbusters for the "American" market.  Countless other examples exist – choices made, changes made – saying loud and clear, "White is better."  Throughout history, Hollywood has undeniably favored the White character, erasing the Asian, celebrated the White movie star, oppressing the Asian (these practices are not exclusive against Asians either; examples can be found shutting out Blacks, Latinos, American Indians and others).

    This is the history that precedes "21," where for no apparent reason (Sturgess hardly has marquee name value) an Asian character is changed to White.  In understanding and admitting that a change was made, one has to acknowledge the significance of that choice. To the filmmakers I ask, given the discriminatory history above (and assuming one can understand the harm in it), one has to ask, "why continue it?"  Yes, you have the "artistic freedom" to cast whomever you wish, but why do you keep making this choice? What does such a choice say about you?   What about "White is better" do you truly believe?

    I present the argument this way because I don’t think this is the belief of the filmmakers.  I trust that people believe in equality, justice and truth. That there is ignorance behind these choices, and perhaps by illuminating on that ignorance, the choice next time will be different.

    Even though the film is not about Jeff Ma’s Chinese American heritage, his ethnicity has tremendous significance in the larger picture, in Hollywood, in the outlook of young generations of Asian American moviegoers – how they are viewed, and how they view themselves. In the American social landscape.  In all of us.

    I don’t think the producers of "21" meant it, they’re just ignorant.  So it’s up to us to continue to work to educate, inform, and make our voice heard.  Go ahead and write to Columbia Pictures, and production companies Michael De Luca Productions, Relativity Media and Trigger Street Productions (Kevin Spacey).

    I would also encourage us all to support our Asian American filmmakers who are continually putting out quality films on low-budget scales. Now in theaters or coming soon (among others): Grace Lee’s "American Zombie" [americanzombiemovie.com] and Michael Kang’s "West 32nd" [www.w32nd.com]  ... oh, and me, in Eric Byler’s "Americanese" [www.americanesethemovie.com].

    Thanks for reading,

    —CT

BLOG評論 (11)

  • 添加評論請先登錄免費註冊
  • fanman
    藝術家空間 
    留言於2008-07-02 1:08PM [举报]
    Really well said, man.  I do agree aesthetic choices based upon "artistic freedom" can be a double-edged sword.  At the end of the day, there's really only a handful of players in the Hollywood monopoly who have the final say on what a film will ultimately "look" like.  Unfortunately, that is a very homogenous crowd who see the world in a very specific if not unrealistic perspective.  But for them, that is their reality and that reality will be projected directly onto any creative product that they will create.  And that has a global domino effect which makes it very difficult if not impossible for anyone of any social conscious or creative ambition to say no to (cause you'll get fired).  Hence you get 21, The Last Samurai, Speed Racer, etc., etc., etc.
  • jasontobin
    藝術家空間 
    留言於2008-04-09 5:23AM [举报]
    How disappointing.

    I skimmed through all the reviews for "21" on rottentomatoes.com and could only come up with one reviewer who questions the casting of a Caucasian in a Asian role.  

    No one even knows this fact unless they're Asian and are concerned about these matters.  So I finally figured it out - America doesn't give a shit.

    Sometimes I wonder why I even bother.
  • georgeshaw
    藝術家空間 
    留言於2008-04-02 9:16AM [举报]
    Well said!
  • rottendoubt
     
    留言於2008-03-31 1:48PM [举报]
    going on a tangent ....

    living in hk now, one thing i've realized that's really interesting about the us is that it's so multi-cultural.  in most other countries in the world, the ethnicity and the country are almost the same thing (ie. chinese in china).  it's like ... if you were a black person that was born and grew up in china and could only speak chinese ... it would seem strange to refer to you as chinese.  yet in the us we have "american".  but, even though it is very multi-cultural ... at the core, it's still a "white" country.  the majority is white and the power still rests with that majority.

    in a country like china, no one thinks it is weird to have every main character be chinese.  or for stories with main characters of other races being converted or played by chinese actors.  but in the us, this exists.
  • mariejost
    藝術家空間 
    留言於2008-03-29 9:18PM [举报]
    Changing Hollywood film culture is a slow proposition.  There is so much money tied up in these films (the GDP for most underdeveloped countries come in around the budget of one Hollywood blockbuster) that they play it safe, very safe.  Also, any large budget Hollywood film is not aimed primarily at the American market.  It is crafted with the international market in mind.  Sometimes the majority of profit of a blockbuster now comes from overseas runs, satellite rebroadcast and DVD sales.  Perhaps it is like the case of India--to ease ethnic tensions, English became the de facto language of the country so that no one ethnic group would be favored.  In the non-White world, what better way to cast a film than include a bunch of White people.  They'll look foreign (but also familiar) to everyone.  They will play equally well in Tokyo as in Zambia, in Bogata as in China.  Because of the money involved, it is going to take a long time to turn this lumbering beast around.

    Much more interesting, I must say, is television.  A lot more ethnic diversity is displayed on television in mainstream programming than ever before.  It is still not perfect, but, perhaps because the budgets are lower everyone is willing to be more flexible in terms of casting.  One of my favorite programs (I'm outing myself as a geek here) is Numbers.  The leads are Jews, the math nerd's girlfriend is South Asian, the FBI team has not only White and Black regular characters, but also a woman of mixed race (indeterminate ethnicity) who plays a recurring character.  What is interesting is that race and ethnicity count for these characters, they are aware of the families and communities they have come from, but it is not the determining factor in how they act.  Lest we forget, American television programs also play internationally.  So, perhaps, the situation isn't as dire as it appears when we examine only big-budget Hollywood films.

    One thing I have noticed, in Asia, when they rework an idea from an American film, all of the actors are suddenly Asian. :-)
  • JasonChau
    留言於2008-03-29 4:45PM [举报]
    I have nothing against white people being cast in certain films. After all I'd been brought up in the West, are used to seeing British/American actors on film. I'd been on both Bond and Harry Potter filmsets before and its easy to see why they have their own agendas. First is the character does literally represent the characters in the novel, and partially to promote the British film industry. The Brits do try very hard to get their actors on stage when it's dominated mostly by American actors. But secondly, being British say, the actors and studio staff know what sort of things they expect from each other. Sadly to say it's a cultural thing, and one thing I find with the Brits is even when they do cast actors/actresses who are Asian for movies, they find them from within their own country. I remember watching Harry Potter with the Chinese girl with Scottish accent cast as Cho Chang. I felt very embarrassed about that because it didn't feel right.

    However that said, some directors like Bernardo Bertolucci do choose specifically when it is required to choose Asian actors, ie. 'The Last Emperor' which was mostly an all-Chinese cast. So racism doesn't necessarily apply to everyone in the industry.

    What is annoying really is when some Hollywood producers keep trying to push Caucasian actors to do Asian roles when the right scripts do come up, and totally believe that it can work. This is the biggest problem. The most blatant one recently being 'Dragonball'. The role of Goku, originally which should have been a role for a Japanese/Chinese/Asian actor, was given to an American guy. The film is not out yet, but I expect it to do badly because from what I heard everybody who's a fan (including my own cousins) have been complaining about it in the forums.

    Hollywood should try to make their films a little bit more realistic and try to give better international representation in their work. After all, the world isn't just made up only of Americans. :)
  • SunnyFluffy
    留言於2008-03-29 4:08PM [举报]
    The answer is simply money.  The studiios know that their major audiece is white.  The majority of white people want to see white characters.  That is why white executives hire more white executives.  They want to work with and be surrounded by people who look like them.  It's racism that the studios use as an excuse to make more money.  They should realize by now that people will pay to see good films.  Some minorities are banking $20 million a picture.  If the film is good people will go and see it.  If they want the next new hot person to be a star, why not use the next hot Asian actor or a known actor for that matter.  It all boils down to money.  They took the Grudge and made that a white cast instead of Asian and so many more fiims.  Justin Lin was offered $2 million to produce his film Better Luck Tomorrow if he would turn his Asian characters into an all white cast.  He refused.  Justin sold his car and maxed out all his credit cards to make this film.  He recieved money to complete this film from MC Hammer, who was impressed with the sense of love that Justin had for his people and the Asian community.  He states often.  It's always about the money.
  • Etchy
     
    留言於2008-03-29 3:36PM [举报]
    i think if its based on actual events then changing the ethnicity of the characters is not cool and worthy of criticism...  

    but I do take exception with the suggestion that a non-Asian can't or shouldn't star in a martial arts film...    Chuck Norris may be the butt of a lot of jokes now, but at the time he was a well respected martial arts champion and was chosen for Bruce Lee's 'Way of the Dragon' for a reason...
  • elavndrc
    留言於2008-03-29 2:38PM [举报]
    i saw the trailer for this movie but actually i've never heard of the actual event...it seems kind of sad that they had to change the lead character's race...I agree with the article that u linked to tho.  they really didn't think they could sell a movie with a lead asian american actor >.> and there are plenty of talented actors that could've aced this lead... i'm sure it'll change one day though.  There always is a period of ignorance before change occurs.
  • pokedpenguin19
    留言於2008-03-29 1:02PM [举报]
    Wow i did not know that this was a true story, with an asian background to it. The movie looks very interesting to me, actually. Hmm >.<
  • wendycheng
    藝術家空間 
    留言於2008-03-29 11:52AM [举报]
    I think as long as the money backing it is from the majority, they'll generally want to see the majority. This has happened to every other ethnicity. Isn't the only solution to get the ranks of Asian Am's with money to finance more indie films? It's pretty much up to our own community.

统计信息

  • 我是一個演員,劇院及電影導演。我也是亞裔美國人劇團 Cedar Grove OnStage的藝術總監,在於市中心的洛杉磯...

    更多

  • 職業:  演員導演戲劇
  • 性別:
  • 查看: 41,452

RSS訂閱

聊天板

Chris Tashima 邀請你瀏覽許多官方藝術家空間並加入他/她的粉絲圈。趕緊註冊,創建你自己的空間,跟好友及喜愛的電影工作者、音樂家及其他藝術家交流。